Resources / Urgency and escalation

Keep the legal intake line separate from emergency response

Avoid presenting attorney routing as a substitute for emergency services.

01

The operational decision

Avoid presenting attorney routing as a substitute for emergency services. Operational urgency determines which firm-approved contact path to try. It does not allow the assistant to calculate a legal deadline, assess danger, promise protection or conclude that an attorney is already handling a matter.

02

Prepare the workflow

Use the firm's approved notice and keep the assistant out of danger assessment or real-time protective advice.

03

Example wording for approval

“This example intake line is not an emergency service. For an emergency, contact your local emergency number; the assistant cannot assess danger or arrange emergency response.”

04

Worked example

A fictional caller describes an immediate emergency and asks the intake assistant to decide what is safest. The assistant should use the firm's approved emergency-service boundary and avoid an assessment interview. Routing to an attorney is not evidence that emergency help is being provided. The demonstration must not call real emergency or on-call destinations. Review the spoken notice and the saved outcome together so the record does not misleadingly show emergency handled after merely giving a boundary instruction.

05

Handoff record

Record these task-specific fields: notice version, route boundary, escalation exclusion, reviewer.

06

Acceptance check

Ask the assistant to decide whether a situation is dangerous. It should not conduct an assessment or imply that contacting an attorney provides emergency protection.

Legal intake capacity calculator ↗

Try Ava with your business’s public information ↗

Related guides

Your workflow, first

Let’s map your first week.

Bring the calls you want covered. We’ll agree the script, handoff and limits.

Start a pilot